Endogenous Preferences and the Study of Institutions
- 2 September 1993
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 87 (3) , 639-656
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2938741
Abstract
The assumption that individual preferences, or attitudes, are fixed and exogenously determined is central to many studies of political and economic institutions, such as markets and elections. We present a Bayesian model of adaptive preferences and empirical evidence consistent with that model to argue that preferences are not always exogenous and fixed. The changing relationships between partisanship and preferences on civil rights issues between 1956 and 1964 and on the Vietnam War issue between 1968 and 1972 coincide with significant changes in the major parties' positions on these issues, suggesting that preferences are endogenous to the electoral process. We conclude with a discussion of the positive and normative implications of endogenous preferences.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Attitudes, No Opinions, and GuessesPolitical Analysis, 1993
- Institutions in American Society: Essays in Market, Political, and Social Organizations.Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 1991
- Estimation of Models with Variable CoefficientsPolitical Analysis, 1991
- Estimation across Data Sets: Two-Stage Auxiliary Instrumental Variables Estimation (2SAIV)Political Analysis, 1989
- The Individual Political Economy of Federal Tax PolicyAmerican Political Science Review, 1987
- Sociotropic Politics: The American CaseBritish Journal of Political Science, 1981
- Ideological Constraint in the Mass Public: A Methodological Critique and Some New FindingsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1978
- Intensities, preferences, and electoral politicsSocial Science Research, 1973
- On the power and importance of the mean preference in a mathematical model of democratic choicePublic Choice, 1968
- Public-Regardingness as a Value Premise in Voting BehaviorAmerican Political Science Review, 1964