Synergistic Contributions of the Functional Groups of Epinephrine to Its Affinity and Efficacy at the β2 Adrenergic Receptor
- 1 May 2004
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Molecular Pharmacology
- Vol. 65 (5) , 1181-1190
- https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.65.5.1181
Abstract
The structural basis of ligand affinity can be approached by studying the interactions between a drug and receptor residues; the basis for efficacy is more complex and must involve activation-associated conformational changes. We have used wild-type (WT), a constitutively active mutant (CAM), and a “constitutively inactive” mutant β2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR) to investigate changes in the binding site that accompany binding and activation. The active state (R*) probably involves repositioning of at least some of the agonist-contact residues, thereby optimizing their interactions with agonist and resulting in a higher affinity for agonist. A comparison of the binding affinities of a series of phenethylamine derivatives for WT revealed a remarkable synergism between the various functional groups present in epinephrine. Binding affinity was essentially unchanged with addition of β-OH, N-CH3, or catechol OHs to phenethylamine. In contrast, when each of these same groups was added to the appropriate compound, already containing the other two groups, to make epinephrine, the increase in affinity was quite large (60- to 120-fold). An initial interaction between two or more contacts may stabilize an intermediate conformation of β2AR, R′, either by altering amino acid side chain rotamer conformations or by a more global conformational change involving the repositioning of transmembrane segments. The pattern of these effects was different in the CAM in that fewer interactions were required to observe the synergistic effect, consistent with the hypothesis that the CAM mutation enriches the proportion of receptors in R* or in R′ from which R* is more readily assumed.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Functionally Different Agonists Induce Distinct Conformations in the G Protein Coupling Domain of the β2Adrenergic ReceptorJournal of Biological Chemistry, 2001
- Chloroethylclonidine and 2-Aminoethyl Methanethiosulfonate Recognize Two Different Conformations of the Human α2A-Adrenergic ReceptorJournal of Biological Chemistry, 1999
- A New Approach to Docking in the β2-Adrenergic Receptor That Exploits the Domain Structure of G-Protein-Coupled ReceptorsJournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1997
- Presence of Two Rhodopsin Intermediates Responsible for Transducin ActivationBiochemistry, 1997
- The Cubic Ternary Complex Receptor–Occupancy Model II. Understanding Apparent AffinityJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1996
- The Active State of the AT1 Angiotensin Receptor Is Generated by Angiotensin II InductionBiochemistry, 1996
- The two-state model of receptor activationTrends in Pharmacological Sciences, 1995
- STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTORSAnnual Review of Biochemistry, 1994
- Photoactivated Conformational Changes in Rhodopsin: A Time-Resolved Spin Label StudyScience, 1993
- Relationship between the inhibition constant (KI) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reactionBiochemical Pharmacology, 1973