Using humanitarian aid to ‘win hearts and minds’: a costly failure?
- 1 December 2011
- journal article
- humanitarian principles-put-at-test
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Review of the Red Cross
- Vol. 93 (884) , 1035-1061
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1816383112000380
Abstract
This article contends that the integration of humanitarian assistance in efforts to ‘win hearts and minds’ in counter-insurgencies has not been successful, and that the costs, both operational and legal, clearly outweigh any benefits. It demonstrates how such manipulation of humanitarian assistance runs counter to fundamental principles of international humanitarian law. In addition, a growing body of research suggests that the use of short-term aid and relief programmes as part of counter-insurgency has been ineffectual, and that, in places such as Afghanistan, it may even have undermined the overall military goal of defeating insurgents. With the United States and NATO military operations winding down in Afghanistan, it is time for the military and policy-makers reviewing ‘winning hearts and minds’ as a counter-insurgency strategy to draw the lessons and recognize the importance of a neutral and independent space for humanitarian aid.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can Hearts and Minds Be Bought? The Economics of Counterinsurgency in IraqJournal of Political Economy, 2011
- The International Committee of the Red Cross in Afghanistan: reasserting the neutrality of humanitarian actionInternational Review of the Red Cross, 2011
- Between a rock and a hard place: integration or independence of humanitarian action?International Review of the Red Cross, 2011
- Provincial Reconstruction Teams: How Do We Know They Work?Published by Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) ,2009