Driving up the Quality and Relevance of Research Through the Use of Agreed Core Outcomes
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 January 2012
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
- Vol. 17 (1) , 1-2
- https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011131
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing StudiesPLoS Medicine, 2011
- The impact of cochrane reviewsPublished by Wiley ,2010
- Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key informationJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2010
- The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviewsBMJ, 2010
- Patient involvement in health research: A contribution to a systematic review on the effectiveness of treatments for degenerative ataxiasSocial Science & Medicine, 2009
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting BiasPLOS ONE, 2008
- Identifying the clinical domains of fibromyalgia: Contributions from clinician and patient delphi exercisesArthritis Care & Research, 2008
- A Systematic Review of Studies That Aim to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials in ChildrenPLoS Medicine, 2008
- Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviewsTrials, 2007
- OMERACT: An international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatologyTrials, 2007