Excavation Sample Size: A Cautionary Tale
- 1 July 1993
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Antiquity
- Vol. 58 (3) , 523-529
- https://doi.org/10.2307/282111
Abstract
Frequently, only five percent or less of a midden site is excavated for environmental-analysis purposes before it is turned over to the bulldozers for destruction. Such exceptionally small sample sizes have become accepted in cultural-resource-management work as adequate for gaining a good understanding of the chronology and cultural activities at a site. This assumption was tested by the author with a 63 percent excavation sampling fraction from a southern California midden. The data indicate that a far-from-complete understanding of a site may result from small sampling fractions and that more carefully designed sampling strategies and statistical manipulation of the data may not overcome this problem.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing Feature Function and Spatial Patterning of Artifacts with Geophysical Remote-Sensing DataAmerican Antiquity, 1991
- Simulation Models and the Interpretation of Archaeological DiversityAmerican Antiquity, 1990
- Shovel-Test Sampling in Archaeological Survey: Comments on Nance and Ball, and LightfootAmerican Antiquity, 1989
- Measurement of Archaeological Diversity and the Sample-Size EffectAmerican Antiquity, 1988
- The Effectiveness of Subsurface Testing: A Simulation ApproachAmerican Antiquity, 1988
- Surface Collection, Sampling, and Research Design: A RetrospectiveAmerican Antiquity, 1987
- Coring Archaeological SitesAmerican Antiquity, 1986
- Regional Surveys in the Eastern United States: The Strengths and Weaknesses of Implementing Subsurface Testing ProgramsAmerican Antiquity, 1986
- No Surprises? The Reliability and Validity of Test Pit SamplingAmerican Antiquity, 1986
- Regional Sampling in Archaeological Survey: The Statistical PerspectivePublished by Elsevier ,1983