Simulation Models and the Interpretation of Archaeological Diversity
- 1 July 1990
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Antiquity
- Vol. 55 (3) , 521-536
- https://doi.org/10.2307/281282
Abstract
Simulation of the effects of sample size on diversity was proposed by Kintigh (1984) as a method for investigating assemblage variability. We suggest several modifications to Kintigh's method that recognize (1) the distinction between the diversity and typological composition of an assemblage and (2) differences in the nature of sample size effects on various measures of diversity. These revisions enabled us to identify significant chronological trends in animal resource diversity during the Neolithic of central Europe.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measurement of Archaeological Diversity and the Sample-Size EffectAmerican Antiquity, 1988
- Hunter-gatherer adaptations and assemblage structureJournal of Anthropological Archaeology, 1987
- Measuring Archaeological Diversity by Comparison with Simulated AssemblagesAmerican Antiquity, 1984
- THE MEASUREMENT AND MEANING OF STYLISTIC DIVERSITYÑawpa Pacha, 1982
- Early Neolithic Subsistence and Settlement in the Polish LowlandsPublished by BAR Publishing ,1982
- The Identification of Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherer Aggregation Sites: The Case of Altamira [and Comments and Reply]Current Anthropology, 1980
- Rarefaction and rarefiction—the use and abuse of a method in paleoecologyPaleobiology, 1979
- The niche concept: Suggestions for its use in human ecologyHuman Ecology, 1975
- The Measurement of Species DiversityAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1974
- Marine Benthic Diversity: A Comparative StudyThe American Naturalist, 1968