Suboptimal adherence to darunavir/ritonavir has minimal effect on efficacy compared with lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive, HIV-infected patients: 96 week ARTEMIS data
Open Access
- 24 May 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
- Vol. 65 (7) , 1505-1509
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkq150
Abstract
To examine how treatment adherence differences in ARTEMIS (96 week analysis) affected clinical outcome, and to assess factors impacting adherence. ARTEMIS is a Phase III trial, in HIV-1-infected treatment-naive patients, comparing efficacy and safety of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir (800/100 mg) versus lopinavir/ritonavir (800/200 mg total daily dose), each with a fixed-dose background tenofovir and emtricitabine regimen. Self-reported treatment adherence was assessed using the Modified Medication Adherence Self-Report Inventory (M-MASRI). In post-hoc analyses, mean adherence from weeks 4–96 was used to assess overall adherence for each patient, and transformed into a binary variable (>95% , adherent; ≤95% , suboptimally adherent). Overall adherence was high: 83% of darunavir/ritonavir-treated patients and 78% of lopinavir/ritonavir-treated patients were >95% adherent. The difference in virological response rate for adherent versus suboptimally adherent patients was smaller for darunavir/ritonavir (6% difference: 82% versus 76%, P = 0.3312) than for lopinavir/ritonavir (25% difference: 78% versus 53%, P < 0.0001). In suboptimally adherent patients, a higher virological response rate was seen with darunavir/ritonavir (76%) versus lopinavir/ritonavir (53%) (P < 0.01). Suboptimally adherent patients (both treatment groups) reported more adverse events (AEs), including gastrointestinal AEs, than adherent patients. Darunavir/ritonavir had a lower rate of AEs, including gastrointestinal AEs, than lopinavir/ritonavir, in adherent and suboptimally adherent patients. Suboptimal adherence had no significant effect on the virological response rate with once-daily darunavir/ritonavir treatment. In contrast, the lopinavir/ritonavir response rate was significantly reduced in suboptimally adherent patients compared with adherent patients. Once-daily darunavir/ritonavir resulted in a higher virological response rate in suboptimally adherent patients compared with lopinavir/ritonavir.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Once-daily darunavir/ritonavir vs. lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected patients: 96-week analysisAIDS, 2009
- Occurrence of selective ritonavir nonadherence and dose-staggering in recipients of boosted HIV-1 protease inhibitor therapy.HIV Research & Clinical Practice, 2009
- Relationship between Adherence Level, Type of the Antiretroviral Regimen, and Plasma HIV Type 1 RNA Viral Load: A Prospective Cohort StudyAIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 2008
- Efficacy and safety of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir versus lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients at week 48AIDS, 2008
- Binding Kinetics of Darunavir to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease Explain the Potent Antiviral Activity and High Genetic BarrierJournal of Virology, 2007
- HIV-Infected Patients Receiving Lopinavir/Ritonavir-Based Antiretroviral Therapy Achieve High Rates of Virologic Suppression Despite Adherence Rates Less Than 95%JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2007
- Responses to a 1 month self-report on adherence to antiretroviral therapy are consistent with electronic data and virological treatment outcomeAIDS, 2002
- Oregon's Death With Dignity ActArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2000