CONTROL OVER RESPONSE NUMBER BY A TARGETED PERCENTILE SCHEDULE: REINFORCEMENT LOSS AND THE ACUTE EFFECTS OF d‐AMPHETAMINE
- 1 September 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 56 (2) , 205-215
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1991.56-205
Abstract
Two fixed-consecutive-number-like procedures were used to examine effects of acute d-amphetamine administration on control over response number. In both procedures, rats were required to press the left lever at least once and then press the right lever to complete a trial. The consecutive left-lever presses on each trial comprised a “run.” Under the targeted percentile schedule, reinforcement was provided if the current run length was closer to the target length (16) than half of the most recent 24 runs. This differentially reinforced run length while holding reinforcement probability constant at .5. A second group acquired the differentiation under the targeted percentile schedule, but were then shifted to a procedure that yoked reinforcement probability by subject and run length to that obtained under the targeted percentile schedule. The two procedures generated practically identical control run lengths, response rates, reinforcement probabilities, and reinforcement rates. Administration of d-amphetamine disrupted percentile responding to a greater degree than yoked control responding. This disruption decreased reinforcement frequency less in the former than the latter procedure. The similar baseline responding under these two procedures suggests that this difference in sensitivity was due to behavioral adjustments to drug prompted by reduction of reinforcement density in the yoked control but not the percentile schedule. These adjustments attenuate the drug's effects under the former, but not the latter, procedure.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reconciling differences in drug effects on behavior punished or maintained by response‐produced shockDrug Development Research, 1990
- Differential effects of opioid and nonopioid analgesics on conditional discriminations in pigeonsPsychopharmacology, 1988
- Effects of mu, kappa and sigma opioids on fixed consecutive number responding in ratsPharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 1987
- Evaluation of the effects of opioid agonists and antagonists under a fixed-consecutive-number schedule in ratsPharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 1987
- Effects of clonazepam and ethosuximide on the responding of pigeons under a fixed-consecutive-number schedule with and without an external discriminative stimulusPsychopharmacology, 1986
- Parametric manipulation of interresponse-time contingency independent of reinforcement rate.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1986
- Schedule-dependent tolerance to behavioral effects of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol when reinforcement frequencies are matchedPharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 1980
- Changes in the rate-increasing effects of d-amphetamine and pentobarbital by response consequencesPsychopharmacology, 1977
- BEHAVIORAL EFFECTS OF CAFFEINE, METHAMPHETAMINE, AND METHYLPHENIDATE IN THE RATJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1963