Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on elbow flexor maximal voluntary isometric strength and endurance
- 1 July 2013
- journal article
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
- Vol. 38 (7) , 734-739
- https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2012-0412
Abstract
The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVC) strength and the time to failure (TTF) in an isometric (30% MVC) muscle endurance test of the elbow flexors were investigated. Fifteen men (mean age, 27.7 ± 8.4 years) were tested for MVC strength and TTF 2 times, separated by a 60-min rest. During the last 10 min of the rest period, 1 of 2 tDCS treatments or 1 sham intervention session was administered, in a randomized order, with 1 week between sessions. In the tDCS intervention, a 2 mA direct current was delivered for 10 min through an anode placed on the scalp, overlying the right motor cortical representation of the left arm; a cathode was secured over the right shoulder. In the sham intervention, the current was delivered for the first 30 s only. No significant differences between the first and second tDCS sessions were evident for MVC strength or TTF. For MVC strength (baseline, 66.0 ± 11.4 Nm), postintervention measures decreased by 5.9% ± 4.2% (p < 0.05), but no significant difference in the changes was evident between tDCS and sham sessions. TTF did not change significantly from preintervention (309.2 ± 91.6 s) to postintervention (327.2 ± 128.5 s), and there was no significant difference between interventions. It was concluded that the tDCS intervention did not affect muscle function, perhaps because of ceiling effects, in which the intervention does not enhance muscle function further when muscle function is already maximal.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACSFrontiers in Psychiatry, 2012
- Enhancing Motor Performance by Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Subacute Stroke PatientsAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 2009
- Establishing safety limits for transcranial direct current stimulationClinical Neurophysiology, 2009
- Modulatory Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Laser-Evoked PotentialsPain Medicine, 2009
- Dual-hemisphere tDCS facilitates greater improvements for healthy subjects' non-dominant hand compared to uni-hemisphere stimulationBMC Neuroscience, 2008
- A randomized, double-blind clinical trial on the efficacy of cortical direct current stimulation for the treatment of major depressionInternational Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2008
- Accessory muscle activity contributes to the variation in time to task failure for different arm postures and loadsJournal of Applied Physiology, 2007
- A randomized, sham‐controlled, proof of principle study of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of pain in fibromyalgiaArthritis & Rheumatism, 2006
- Caffeine lowers perceptual response and increases power output during high-intensity cyclingJournal of Sports Sciences, 2004
- Multiple Features of Motor-Unit Activity Influence Force Fluctuations During Isometric ContractionsJournal of Neurophysiology, 2003