“They got their program, and I got mine”: A cautionary tale concerning the ethical implications of using respondent-driven sampling to study injection drug users
- 15 January 2008
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Drug Policy
- Vol. 19 (1) , 42-51
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.11.014
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estimating Numbers of Injecting Drug Users in Metropolitan Areas for Structural Analyses of Community Vulnerability and for Assessing Relative Degrees of Service Provision for Injecting Drug UsersJournal of Urban Health, 2004
- Ethics in Drug Abuse and Related HIV Risk ResearchApplied Developmental Science, 2004
- For love or money? An exploratory study of why injecting drug users participate in researchAddiction, 2001
- Confidentiality, disseminated regulation and ethico-legal liabilities in research with hidden populations of illicit drug usersAddiction, 1997
- Street-level drug markets: Network structure and HIV riskSocial Networks, 1995
- Drug Users versus Outreach Workers in Combating Aids: Preliminary Results of a Peer-Driven InterventionJournal of Drug Issues, 1995
- AIDS Prevention Outreach among Injection Drug Users: Agency Problems and New ApproachesSocial Problems, 1994
- HIV Infection and Intravenous Drug Use: Critical Issues in Transmission Dynamics, Infection Outcomes, and PreventionClinical Infectious Diseases, 1988
- Snowball SamplingThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1961
- Cats, Kicks, and ColorSocial Problems, 1957