Quality, Cost, and Clinical Decisions

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Clinical decisions require determining the objectives of care as well as selecting and implementing a strategy of care. At the very least the optimal strategy balances the expected benefit and harm from technical interventions. Health care practitioners tend to specify optimal strategies based on what they consider to be best for patients, without regard to monetary cost. This is an absolutist definition of quality. Individuals may place different valuations on the outcomes, are concerned with the monetary costs to themselves, and are particularly sensitive to the attributes of the interpersonal relationship with the practitioners. Including all of these leads to an individualized definition of the quality of care. But this specification of quality may be in conflict with a social definition of quality, which takes into account social as well as individual monetary costs, externalities, and the social distribution of quality. The health care professions may respond to the conflict in several ways, which are described in this article as evasion, rejection and confrontation, anticipation, advocacy, active complicity, passive complicity, and ambiguous adaptations.

This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit: