Self-Ownership, Autonomy, and Property Rights
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Social Philosophy and Policy
- Vol. 11 (2) , 241-258
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265052500004507
Abstract
Writers of very different persuasions have relied on arguments about self-ownership; in recent years, it is libertarians who have rested their political theory on self-ownership, but Grotian authoritarianism rested on similar foundations, and, even though it matters a good deal that Hegel did not adopt a full-blown theory of self-ownership, so did Hegel's liberal-conservatism. Whether the high tide of the idea has passed it is hard to say. One testimony to its popularity was the fact that G. A. Cohen for a time thought that the doctrine of self-ownership was so powerful that an egalitarian like himself had to come to terms with it; but he has since changed his mind. I have tackled the topic of self-ownership glancingly elsewhere, but have not hitherto tried to pull together the observations I have made in passing on those occasions. The view I have taken for granted and here defend is that self-ownership is not an illuminating notion—except in contexts that are unattractive to anyone of libertarian tastes.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Lockean Theory of RightsPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1992
- Libertarianism, postlibertarianism, and the welfare state: Reply to FriedmanCritical Review, 1992
- Hegel: Elements of the Philosophy of RightPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1991
- A Theory of JusticePublished by Harvard University Press ,1971