Procedure-Related Complications of Amniocentesis and Chorionic Villous Sampling
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 110 (3) , 687-694
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000278820.54029.e3
Abstract
To compile a systematic review of complications related to genetic amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling (CVS) to provide benchmark data for counseling and performance assessment of individual operators. We searched the MEDLINE database for articles published after January 1, 1995, that reported data for at least 100 women with singleton pregnancies with genetic amniocentesis after 14 weeks of pregnancy and reports of CVS carried out transabdominally between 10 and 14 weeks. For amniocentesis, 29 articles fulfilled search criteria. Sixteen studies fulfilled search criteria for CVS. After genetic amniocentesis, pooled pregnancy loss within 14 days was 0.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5-0.7), rising to 0.9% (95% CI 0.6-1.3) for pregnancy loss before 24 weeks and 1.9% (95% CI 1.4-2.5) for total pregnancy loss. Corresponding figures for CVS were 0.7%, 1.3%, and 2%. The data on multiple insertions showed large heterogeneity, ranging from 0.2% to 2.9% for amniocentesis (pooled risk 2.0%, 95% CI 0.9-3.6) and from 1.4% to 26.6% for CVS (pooled risk 7.8%, 95% CI 3.1-14.2). Only five amniocentesis studies provided controls, but none was matched for gestational age. Pooled relative risks for fetal loss before 28 weeks and total pregnancy loss were 1.46 (95% CI 0.86-2.49) and 1.25 (95% CI 1.02-1.53), respectively. Although the risks of pregnancy loss are relatively low, lack of adequate controls tends to underestimate the true added risk of prenatal invasive procedures.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pregnancy Loss Rates After Midtrimester AmniocentesisObstetrics & Gynecology, 2006
- Fetal DNA in Maternal PlasmaAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2006
- Pregnancy Outcome Following Second-Trimester Amniocentesis: A Case-Control StudyAmerican Journal of Perinatology, 2006
- Evidence-based obstetric ethics and informed decision-making by pregnant women about invasive diagnosis after first-trimester assessment of risk for trisomy 21American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2005
- Risk of amniocentesis in women screened positive for Down syndrome with second trimester maternal serum markersPrenatal Diagnosis, 2002
- A single physician's experience with four thousand six hundred genetic amniocentesesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2001
- Genetic amniocentesis in women 20-34 years old: associated risksPrenatal Diagnosis, 2000
- Amniocentesis-Related Fetal Loss: A Cohort StudyObstetrics & Gynecology, 1998
- Amniocentesis before 15 weeks' gestation: technical aspects and obstetric risksEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1995
- RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS IN 4606 LOW-RISK WOMENPublished by Elsevier ,1986