Far‐field potentials
- 1 March 1993
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Muscle & Nerve
- Vol. 16 (3) , 237-254
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880160302
Abstract
Far‐field potentials are produced by neural generators located at a distance from the recording electrodes. These potentials were initially characterized incorrectly as being of positive polarity, widespread distribution, and constant latency; however, recent advances have clearly demonstrated that far‐field potentials may be either positive or negative depending upon the location of the electrodes with respect to the orientation of the dipole generator. Additionally, peak latencies in the far‐field can vary with alterations in body position and the spatial distribution of far‐field potentials, while widespread, is not uniform. Recent studies of far‐field potentials suggest how such waveforms are produced when the symmetry of an action potential, as recorded by distant electrodes, is broken by such factors as differing conductivities of volume conductor compartments, direction of action potential propagation, size differentials in adjoining body segments, or the termination of action potential propagation in excitable tissue. Human, animal, and computer experiments support the preceding generalizations. These new explanations are directly applicable to such far‐field potentials as the short latency somatosensory‐evoked potential. Furthermore, since far‐field potentials can also occur in muscle tissue, one should expect that these generalizations will hold with respect to electromyographic potentials. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Far‐field potentials in circular volumes: The effect of different volume sizes and intercompartmental openingsMuscle & Nerve, 1992
- Possible model for generation of P9 far‐field potentialsMuscle & Nerve, 1992
- Far-field potentials in circular volumes: Evidence to support the leading/trailing dipole modelMuscle & Nerve, 1992
- Far‐field potentials in muscleMuscle & Nerve, 1991
- Practical Instrumentation and Common Sources of ErrorAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 1988
- What determines the latency and amplitude of stationary peaks in far‐field recordings?Annals of Neurology, 1986
- SHORT‐LATENCY SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED POTENTIALS FOLLOWING MEDIAN NERVE STIMULATIONAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1982
- STIMULATING AND RECORDING METHODS USED IN OBTAINING SHORT‐LATENCY SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED POTENTIALS (SEPs) IN PATIENTS WITH CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL NEUROLOGIC DISORDERS*Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1982
- AUDITORY-EVOKED FAR FIELDS AVERAGED FROM THE SCALP OF HUMANSBrain, 1971
- Human Auditory Evoked Potentials: Possible Brain Stem Components Detected on the ScalpScience, 1970