Ways of influencing the behaviour of general practitioners.
- 1 November 1986
- journal article
- review article
- Vol. 36 (292) , 517-21
Abstract
What evidence is there for the success or failure of the different methods used to influence the behaviour of general practitioners, whether in their work with patients, or in the organization of a practice?This preliminary exploration of the literature suggests that, although change is always occurring, its deliberate inducement is usually slow and laborious. Doubt is cast on the efficacy of existing financial incentives, and of unsolicited feedback about performance. There is little evidence for the influence of audit on behaviour but personal contact with doctors, nurses and other colleagues, and to a lesser extent with patients, is relatively effective, both in influencing the teamwork of a practice and in more formal education. However, it is combinations of different methods which most successfully influence general practitioners.This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical psychologist in primary care: controlled clinical and economic evaluation.BMJ, 1984
- Impact of audit on preventive measures.BMJ, 1983
- Impact of medical school laboratory courses and physician attitude on test use by house staffAcademic Medicine, 1983
- Overcoming isolation in London. Fellowships in general practice in St Thomas's district.BMJ, 1982
- Practice educational meetings: a new influence in general practice.BMJ, 1981
- An evaluation of recorded information about preventive measures in 38 practices.1981
- Psychotropic drug prescribing: a self-audit.1980
- Drug advertising and prescribing.1978
- Continuing medical education. The philosphy and use of auditJAMA, 1976
- The first three months of free contraception in a market-town group practice.1976