Do patients want to be informed? A study of consent for cardiac catheterisation.
Open Access
- 1 October 1984
- Vol. 52 (4) , 468-470
- https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.52.4.468
Abstract
One hundred and four patients were asked to recall what they had been told before they gave consent for cardiac catheterisation to be performed. Of these, 14% had received no explanation, 24% had not been warned to expect specific symptoms or side effects, 40% had been told that complications were possible, and 26% had been warned that there was a risk of death. Most patients did not know about these risks, and two thirds would not have wanted to be told about them. Doctors should neither insist on gaining fully informed consent from anxious patients nor deny detailed information to inquiring ones.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Surgeon's Duty to Warn of Risks: Transatlantic Approach Rejected by Court of AppealThe Lancet, 1984
- Paternalistic BehaviorPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1982
- What the Doctor Must Tell the PatientMedicine, Science and the Law, 1982
- Informed consent to medical treatment.1981
- Informed Consent — Why Are Its Goals Imperfectly Realized?New England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- THE AMNESIC EFFECT OF DIAZEPAM (VALIUM)British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1970