Optimising recruitment into a study of physical activity in older people: a randomised controlled trial of different approaches
Open Access
- 20 August 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Age and Ageing
- Vol. 37 (6) , 659-665
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afn159
Abstract
Background: physical activity studies in older people often have poor recruitment. Including a questionnaire with the invitation would provide information about non-participants and selection bias, but could reduce recruitment. Telephone contact might encourage participation. Objective: to test the effects of different strategies for recruitment into a study of physical activity in older people. Design: factorial randomised controlled trial. Randomisation by household into four groups: telephone contact plus questionnaire, telephone contact only, questionnaire only, neither. Setting: primary care, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. Participants: 560 patients ≥ 65 years randomly selected after exclusions. Interventions: questionnaire to assess health, functional ability and physical activity. Telephone contact by the research nurse a week after sending study information. Main Outcome Measure: recruitment into physical activity study. Results: telephone contact increased recruitment: contact 47.9% (134/280), no contact 37.9% (106/280), difference (adjusted for the clustering effect of household) 10.0% (95% CI 0.2-19.8). Questionnaire inclusion did not significantly reduce recruitment: no questionnaire 44.3% (124/280) questionnaire 41.4% (116/280) difference −2.9% (95% CI −12.7−7.0). Conclusions: telephone contact significantly increased recruitment and should be considered in studies where recruitment may be low. While inclusion of a questionnaire provided valuable information on non-participants and did not significantly reduce recruitment, an adverse recruitment effect could not be excluded.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Maximising response to postal questionnaires – A systematic review of randomised trials in health researchBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2006
- Brisk walking, fitness, and cardiovascular risk: A randomized controlled trial in primary carePreventive Medicine, 2005
- Cost effectiveness of a community based exercise programme in over 65 year olds: cluster randomised trialJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2004
- Why older people do not participate in leisure time physical activity: a survey of activity levels, beliefs and deterrentsAge and Ageing, 2004
- Follow-up by mail in clinical trials: does questionnaire length matter?Controlled Clinical Trials, 2004
- Telephone reminders are a cost effective way to improve responses in postal health surveysJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2002
- Considerations for the design and analysis of experimental studies in physical activity and exercise promotion: advantages of the randomised controlled trialBritish Journal of Sports Medicine, 2000
- Challenges Faced in Recruiting Patients from Primary Care Practices into a Physical Activity Intervention TrialPreventive Medicine, 1999
- Recruitment of Older Adults for a Randomized, Controlled Trial of Exercise Advice in a General Practice SettingJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1999
- Cost-effectiveness of a primary care based physical activity intervention in 45-74 year old men and women: a randomised controlled trial.British Journal of Sports Medicine, 1998