Structure-based prediction of protein–protein interactions on a genome-wide scale

Top Cited Papers
Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Protein–protein interactions, essential for understanding how a cell functions, are predicted using a new method that combines protein structure with other computationally and experimentally derived clues. The analysis of protein-interaction networks is essential to an understanding of the regulatory processes in a living cell. Many methods have been developed with a view to predicting protein–protein interactions (PPIs) at a genome-wide level, although the differences obtained using these approaches suggest that there are still factors unaccounted for. Barry Honig and colleagues have developed a new way of predicting PPIs that is based on the proteins' three-dimensional structures and functional data. Tests of several predictions of the new algorithm, known as PREPPI, confirm the accuracy of the results. The genome-wide identification of pairs of interacting proteins is an important step in the elucidation of cell regulatory mechanisms1,2. Much of our present knowledge derives from high-throughput techniques such as the yeast two-hybrid assay and affinity purification3, as well as from manual curation of experiments on individual systems4. A variety of computational approaches based, for example, on sequence homology, gene co-expression and phylogenetic profiles, have also been developed for the genome-wide inference of protein–protein interactions (PPIs)5,6. Yet comparative studies suggest that the development of accurate and complete repertoires of PPIs is still in its early stages7,8,9. Here we show that three-dimensional structural information can be used to predict PPIs with an accuracy and coverage that are superior to predictions based on non-structural evidence. Moreover, an algorithm, termed PrePPI, which combines structural information with other functional clues, is comparable in accuracy to high-throughput experiments, yielding over 30,000 high-confidence interactions for yeast and over 300,000 for human. Experimental tests of a number of predictions demonstrate the ability of the PrePPI algorithm to identify unexpected PPIs of considerable biological interest. The surprising effectiveness of three-dimensional structural information can be attributed to the use of homology models combined with the exploitation of both close and remote geometric relationships between proteins.