Microinjection of inositol 1,2‐(cyclic)‐4,5‐trisphosphate, inositol 1,3,4,5‐tetrakisphosphate, and inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate into intact Xenopus oocytes can induce membrane currents independent of extracellular calcium

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Inositol phosphate action in an intact cell has been investigated by intracellular microinjection of eight inositol phosphate derivatives into Xenopus laevis oocytes. These cells have calcium‐regulated chloride channels but do not have a calcium‐induced calcium release system. Microinjection of inositol 1,3,4,5‐tetrakisphosphate (IP4), inositol 1,2‐(cyclic)‐4,5‐trisphosphate (cIP3), inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate (IP3), or inositol 4,5‐bisphosphate [(4,5)IP2], open chloride channels to induce a membrane depolarization. However, inositol 1‐phosphate (IP1), inositol 1,3,4,5,6‐pentakisphosphate (IP5), inositol 1,4‐bisphosphate, or inositol 3,4‐bisphosphate are unable to induce this depolarization. The depolarization is mimicked by calcium microinjection, inhibited by EGTA coinjection, and is insensitive to removal of extracellular calcium. By means of the depolarization response, the efficacy of various inositol phosphate derivatives are compared. IP3 and cIP3 induce similar half‐maximal, biphasic depolarization responses at an intracellular concentration of approximately 90 nM, whereas IP4 induces a mono‐ or biphasic depolarization at approximately 3400 nM. At concentrations similar to that required for IP3 and cIP3, (4,5)IP2 induces a long‐term (greater than 40 min) depolarization. The efficacy (cIP3 = IP3 = (4,5)IP2 ≫ IP4) and action of the various inositol phosphates in an intact cell and their inability to induce meiotic cell division are discussed.