Favoritism in Mutual Fund Families? Evidence on Strategic Cross‐Fund Subsidization
Top Cited Papers
- 20 January 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 61 (1) , 73-104
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00830.x
Abstract
We investigate whether mutual fund families strategically transfer performance across member funds to favor those more likely to increase overall family profits. We find that “high family value” funds (i.e., high fees or high past performers) overperform at the expense of “low value” funds. Such a performance gap is above the one existing between similar funds not affiliated with the same family. Better allocations of underpriced initial public offering deals and opposite trades across member funds partly explain why high value funds overperform. Our findings highlight how the family organization prevalent in the mutual fund industry generates distortions in delegated asset management.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can Mutual Fund Families Affect the Performance of Their Funds?SSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
- Does Fund Size Erode Performance? Liquidity, Organizational Diseconomies and Active Money ManagementSSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
- Entry Decisions by Mutual Fund FamiliesSSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
- A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and AllocationsThe Journal of Finance, 2002
- Ferreting out Tunneling: An Application to Indian Business GroupsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2002
- Mutual Fund Performance: An Empirical Decomposition into Stock‐Picking Talent, Style, Transactions Costs, and ExpensesThe Journal of Finance, 2000
- Costly Search and Mutual Fund FlowsThe Journal of Finance, 1998
- Risk Taking by Mutual Funds as a Response to IncentivesJournal of Political Economy, 1997
- Mutual fund stylesJournal of Financial Economics, 1997
- Of Tournaments and Temptations: An Analysis of Managerial Incentives in the Mutual Fund IndustryThe Journal of Finance, 1996