Correlation between annual volume of cystectomy, professional staffing, and outcomes
Open Access
- 25 July 2005
- Vol. 104 (5) , 975-984
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21273
Abstract
BACKGROUND The association between high procedure volume and lower perioperative mortality is well established among cancer patients who undergo cystectomy. However, to the authors' knowledge, the association between volume and perioperative complications has not been studied to date and hospital characteristics contributing to the volume-outcome correlation are unknown. In the current study, the authors studied these associations, emphasizing hospital factors that contribute to the volume-outcome correlation. METHODS Multiple-variable models of inpatient mortality and complications were developed among all 1302 bladder carcinoma patients who underwent cystectomy between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2001 in all Texas hospitals. General estimating equations were used to adjust for clustering within the 133 hospitals. Data were obtained from hospital claims, the 2000 U.S. Census, and databases from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the American Hospital Association. RESULTS Complications were reported to occur in 12% of patients, 2.2% of whom died. Mortality was higher in low-volume hospitals compared with high-volume hospitals (3.1% vs. 0.7%; P < 0.001); mortality in moderate-volume hospitals was reported to be intermediate (2.9%). After adjustment for advanced age and comorbid conditions, treatment in high-volume hospitals was associated with lower risks of mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.35; P = 0.02) and complications (OR = 0.53; P = 0.01). Hospitals with a high registered nurse-to-patient ratio also had a lower mortality risk (OR = 0.43; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Mortality after cystectomy was found to be significantly lower in high-volume hospitals, regardless of patient age. Referral to a hospital performing greater than 10 cystectomies annually is indicated for all patients. However, patients with poor access to a high-volume hospital may derive similar benefit from treatment at a hospital with a high-registered nurse-to-patient ratio. This finding requires further confirmation. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do Well-Publicized Risk-Adjusted Outcomes Reports Affect Hospital Volume?Medical Care, 2004
- The Effects of Nurse Staffing on Adverse Events, Morbidity, Mortality, and Medical CostsNursing Research, 2003
- Licensed Nurse Staffing and Adverse Events in HospitalsMedical Care, 2003
- Will Volume-Based Referral Strategies Reduce Costs Or Just Save Lives?Health Affairs, 2002
- Nurse Staffing and Postsurgical Adverse Events: An Analysis of Administrative Data from a Sample of U.S. Hospitals, 1990–1996Health Services Research, 2002
- The Influence of Hospital Volume on Survival after Resection for Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Quality of Care Information Makes a DifferenceMedical Care, 1998
- Presentation adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: Differing perspectivesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- Should Operations Be Regionalized?New England Journal of Medicine, 1979