Recruitment, follow-up and analysis times in clinical trials of cancer treatment: a case study
Open Access
- 1 October 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 62 (4) , 687-691
- https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1990.358
Abstract
A study has been made of the way in which the number of events available for analysis in a clinical trial was dependent on the recruitment period, the maximum follow-up time on individual patients and the length of time between the start of the trial and its analysis. The events considered were deaths, local recurrences and late radiation effects on normal tissue in patients treated for cancer of the laryngo-pharynx by two different fractionation regimes. The relationship is demonstrated between the number of events and the 95% confidence intervals that can be placed on differences between results in the two arms of the trial. It was found, in this particular trial, that no significant improvement in precision was gained by following up patients beyond 5 years or carrying out the analysis later than 2 years after the end of recruitment. The results are discussed in the context of the initial design of clinical trials, particularly those in which the aim is to test therapeutic equivalence.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Final Report of the general clinical results of the British Institute of Radiology fractionation study of 3F/wk versus 5F/wk in radiotherapy of carcinoma of the laryngo-pharynxThe British Journal of Radiology, 1990
- How to establish equivalence between treatments: A one‐sided clinical trial in paediatric oncologyStatistics in Medicine, 1989
- “Proving the null hypothesis” in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1982
- Seventh Interim Progress Report of The British Institute of Radiology fractionation study of 3F/week versus 5F/week in radiotherapy of the laryngo-pharynxThe British Journal of Radiology, 1982
- Tables of the number of patients required in clinical trials using the logrank testStatistics in Medicine, 1982
- SAMPLE-SIZE REQUIREMENTS FOR EVALUATING A CONSERVATIVE THERAPY1978
- Group sequential methods in the design and analysis of clinical trialsBiometrika, 1977
- Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. Analysis and examplesBritish Journal of Cancer, 1977
- Planning the size and duration of a clinical trial studying the time to some critical eventJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1974
- Repeated assessment of results in clinical trials of cancer treatmentThe British Journal of Radiology, 1971