THE ROLE OF COGNITIVE ABILITY IN THE SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES AND INCREMENTAL VALIDITY OF ASSESSMENT CENTER EXERCISES
- 1 June 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Personnel Psychology
- Vol. 51 (2) , 357-374
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00729.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Evaluation of Two Strategies for Reducing Adverse Impact and Their Effects on Criterion-Related ValidityHuman Performance, 1996
- An exercise design approach to understanding assessment center dimension and exercise constructs.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1992
- Why is there no study of cultural equivalence in standardized cognitive ability testing?American Psychologist, 1992
- Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learningCognitive Science, 1988
- Meta-analysis of assessment center validity.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987
- Meta-analysis of assessment center validity.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987
- PERFORMANCE TESTING: A ROSE AMONG THORNS?Personnel Psychology, 1979
- JOB SAMPLE VS. PAPER‐AND‐PENCIL TRADES AND TECHNICAL TESTS: ADVERSE IMPACT AND EXAMINEE ATTITUDES1Personnel Psychology, 1977
- Sex and race composition of assessment center groups as a determinant of peer and assessor ratings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977
- Sex and race composition of assessment center groups as a determinant of peer and assessor ratings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977