Calculation of left ventricular wall stress.
- 1 August 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation Research
- Vol. 67 (2) , 245-252
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.67.2.245
Abstract
Chamber-stress equations relate wall stresses to pressure and wall dimensions. Such equations play a central role in the analysis and understanding of heart-chamber function. Over the past three decades, several stress equations giving radically different results have been derived, used, and/or espoused. They can be classified into two categories, according to the definition of stress underlying the equation. The stresses in one class of equations are total forces per unit normal area, excluding ambient pressure but including pressure in the wall exerted by more external elements of the wall. The stresses in the other class of equations are fiber-pulling forces per unit normal area, that is, total forces per unit normal area excluding all pressure. The validity of stress equations can be tested at least three ways: 1) Do they predict that the pressure inside a small chamber nested in a larger chamber would be the sum of transmural pressures of the two chambers? 2) Do they satisfy the expectation from Laplace''s law that a sphere with a given circular stress and thickness/radius ratio would exert twice the pressure of a cylinder with the same circular stress and thickness/radius ratio? 3) Do they predict that the ratio of principle stresses depends on chamber shape but not on wall/cavity ratio, with the circular/longitudinal stress ratio of a cylinder being 2 and that of a prolate spheroid being between 1 and 2? Stress equations of the first class fail all of these tests by large margins, whereas those of the second class pass all of these tests exactly. When selecting a stress equation, one should consider these distinctions as they might affect 1) evaluation of stress afterload and stress preload, 2) evaluation of contractility, 3) understanding the roles of contractility and wall/cavity ratio as determinants of pressure-making ability, 4) understanding the role of fiber orientation as a determinant of chamber shape, and 5) translations between pressure-volume relations and stress-length relations.This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Correction for preload in assessment of myocardial contractility in aortic and mitral valve disease. Application of the concept of systolic myocardial stiffness.Circulation, 1988
- Independent determinants of systolic effectiveness: Growth ability, contractility and mobilityJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1988
- Left-ventricular cavity dimensions in children with normal and dilated heartsPediatric Cardiology, 1988
- Evaluation of myocardial properties from image/pressure data: Chronic conditionsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1986
- Dependence of heart chamber dimensions and dynamics on chamber demands and myocardial propertiesJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1986
- Left ventricular mechanics in dilated cardiomyopathyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984
- Myocardial stress equations: Fiberstresses of the prolate spheroidJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1984
- The dependence of chamber dynamics on chamber dimensionsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1983
- The effects of geometry, elasticity, and external pressures on the diastolic pressure-volume and stiffness-stress relations. How important is the pericardium?Circulation Research, 1979
- Passive elastic wall stiffness of the left ventricle: A comparison between linear theory and large deformation theoryBulletin of Mathematical Biology, 1976