Development of a model of rule use in negotiation interaction
- 2 June 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Monographs
- Vol. 48 (2) , 106-120
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758109376051
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to develop a model of negotiation rule use that incorporates both content and relational dimensions of communication and focuses upon interaction as the dependent variable. Fourteen negotiation rules are hypothesized to structure the negotiation interaction. From these rules fourteen interaction analysis categories are developed—with seven assessing how negotiators respond to one another and seven assessing how negotiators cue or constrain the opponent's next utterance. Interactions in mock negotiations are coded using this category scheme and placed into cue‐response transition matrices. The differences in interaction patterns among winners and losers are used to assess the extent to which the rules structure the negotiation interaction.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- The structure of communication rules and the form of conversation: An experimental simulationWestern Journal of Speech Communication, 1980
- A rules‐based model for the analysis and evaluation of organizational communicationCommunication Quarterly, 1979
- On the falsification of rules theoriesQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1978
- Development of a Content Analytic System for Analysis of Bargaining Communication in MarketingJournal of Marketing Research, 1978
- Negotiation as a Psychological ProcessJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1977
- The rules perspective as a theoretical basis for the study of human communicationCommunication Quarterly, 1977
- A review of experiments in explicit bargainingJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1976
- Managing Conflict in Distribution Channels: A Laboratory StudyJournal of Marketing Research, 1973
- Verbal persuasive strategies in mixed‐motive interactionsQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1970
- Speech ActsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1969