Radical Prostatectomy: Anatomical Predictors of Success or Failure
- 1 November 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 136 (5) , 1041-1043
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)45201-3
Abstract
A total of 143 patients underwent radical prostatectomy. Surgical specimens were evaluated with respect to local extent of disease, Gleason grade of the primary and relative nuclear roundness of the surgical specimen. The probability of disease control in the total population was 88 per cent at 5 years. Only 8 per cent of the patients who had disease confined to the specimen failed compared to 14 per cent of those who demonstrated extension outside of the surgical margins. The incidence of failure increased as a function of seminal vesicle involvement. Seminal vesicle involvement was greatest among patients with a Gleason grade greater than 7. Postoperative radiation did not offer any apparent advantage in patients with positive margins.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- A New Method to Assess Metastatic Potential of Human Prostate Cancer: Relative Nuclear RoundnessJournal of Urology, 1982
- Radical Surgery Versus Radiotherapy for Adenocarcinoma of the ProstateJournal of Urology, 1982
- Radical Prostatectomy for Stage B2 Prostatic CancerJournal of Urology, 1982
- Radical Perineal Prostatectomy for Clinical Stage B2 Carcinoma of the ProstateJournal of Urology, 1982
- Computerized image analysis of nuclear shape as a prognostic factor for prostatic cancerThe Prostate, 1982
- Radical Surgery for Prostatic CancerCancer, 1980