The Effect of Cognitive Style on the Preferred Format of Instructional Material
- 1 March 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Educational Psychology
- Vol. 17 (1-2) , 179-183
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170113
Abstract
A total of 90 15‐16‐year‐old female pupils from a single‐sex secondary grammar school did the Cognitive Styles Analysis which assessed their position on the Wholist‐Analytic and Verbal‐Imagery learning style dimensions. They were asked to select their preferred format of a single‐sheet handout on study skills which was offered in three modes: Unstructured‐Verbal, Structured‐Verbal and Structured‐Pictorial. Each mode contained the same information and differed only in format. On the format preference, there was a significant effect of the Verbal‐Imagery dimension (p = 0.002), with the majority of Verbalisers choosing the Structured‐Verbal sheet and the Imagers opting for the Structured‐Pictorial version. There was a smaller effect on the Wholist‐Analytic dimension, where Wholist had a preference for the Structured‐Pictorial and the Analytics for the Structured‐Verbal version (p = 0.056). The findings were discussed in terms of their practical implications for a differentiated approach to instruction.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychology and Adult LearningPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2002
- Cognitive Style and Pupil Learning PreferencesEducational Psychology, 1996
- The effect of cognitive style and mode of presentation on learning performanceBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 1993
- The Effect of Pupil Cognitive Style and Position of Prose Passage Title on RecallEducational Psychology, 1993
- Type of Instructional Material, Cognitive Style and Learning PerformanceEducational Studies, 1992
- Cognitive Styles—an overview and integrationEducational Psychology, 1991
- Verbaliser‐Imager Learning Style and Children's Recall of Information Presented in Pictorial versus Written FormEducational Studies, 1980