Overcoming misconceptions in science: An on‐line study of prior knowledge activation
- 1 June 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Reading Research and Instruction
- Vol. 28 (4) , 12-26
- https://doi.org/10.1080/19388078909557983
Abstract
Students with misconceptions about the principles of motion either had their misconceptions activated or not. They then read one of two types of text‐text which refuted misconceptions or text without refutation. Testing revealed that, while there was no significant difference relating to the type of text, students who had misconceptions activated did better on short answer and true false tests, but not on an application task. In order to explore how readers overcome misconceptions, a selected group of students was asked to recall their thinking as they reread their text on the computer and/or were interviewed in relation to each of the assigned tasks. On the basis of these data, it was suggested that students who have misconceptions after formal experience may have a more difficult time overcoming them than students who have no formal experience in physics. Further, students who use a variety of strategies for processing the information may have an advantage over students who use fewer strategies.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prior Knowledge Activation and the Comprehension of Compatible and Incompatible TextReading Research Quarterly, 1985
- Intuitive PhysicsScientific American, 1983
- The Influence of Religious Affiliation on Children's Memory for Text InformationReading Research Quarterly, 1983
- Effect of mobilizing prior knowledge on learning from text.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982
- Learning New Information from Text: The Role of Prior Knowledge and Reading AbilityJournal of Reading Behavior, 1982
- Learning from text, levels of comprehension, or: Why anyone would read a story anywayPoetics, 1980