Tuberculosis diagnostics trials: do they lack methodological rigor?
- 1 July 2006
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics
- Vol. 6 (4) , 509-514
- https://doi.org/10.1586/14737159.6.4.509
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Childhood Pulmonary TuberculosisAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- New tools and emerging technologies for the diagnosis of tuberculosis: Part II. Active tuberculosis and drug resistanceExpert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, 2006
- New tools and emerging technologies for the diagnosis of tuberculosis: Part I. Latent tuberculosisExpert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, 2006
- Progress towards improved tuberculosis diagnostics for developing countriesThe Lancet, 2006
- Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studiesCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2006
- Bacteriophage-based assays for the rapid detection of rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a meta-analysisJournal of Infection, 2005
- Evaluation of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests in the Absence of a Perfect Gold-Standard TestEpidemiology, 2005
- Interferon-γ assays in the immunodiagnosis of tuberculosis: a systematic reviewThe Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Assessment by Meta-Analysis of PCR for Diagnosis of Smear-Negative Pulmonary TuberculosisJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003
- Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD InitiativeAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2003