Determination of Movements of African Penguins Spheniscus Demersus Using a Compass System: Dead Reckoning May be an Alternative to Telemetry

Abstract
Determination of animal movements is essentially achieved by a temporal sequence of positional fixes. Currently, evaluation of animal positions depends on energy transmission between the animal and the perceiver. The distance between animal and perceiver and the type of medium separating them determine the proportion of energy transmitted in relation to that received. Visual localization of animals is most used, but transmission of optical images is highly variable and rarely effective over decametres. Superior sonic transmission in water and radio-transmission in air have led researchers to fit animals with power sources so that positional information can be obtained by triangulation with specialized receivers (Priede, 1983; Kenward, 1987). This increases perceptive range, but the ‘distance’ and ‘medium’ problems still apply (Kenward, 1987). Moreover, the accuracy of positional fixes decreases with increasing transmitter/receiver distance (Heezen and Tester, 1967; Springer, 1979) so that, for far-ranging animals, only gross movements can be determined. Satellite tracking systems (Jouventin and Wei-merskirch, 1990) set a specific limit on this form of error but, even so, extended transmitter/receiver distances require large power sources to allow reception of a viable signal despite attenuation by the intervening medium. Ultimately, the viability of most telemetric systems is a balance between having a small enough power source so that animal behaviour is minimally altered (Holliday et al. 1988; Wanless et al. 1989) but large enough to enable signal transmission.