Democracy, Consultation, and the Paneling of Disputes under GATT
- 1 August 2000
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Vol. 44 (4) , 425-446
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002700044004002
Abstract
Studies of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) stress the role of formal panels in adjudicating trade conflicts. Yet most cases are settled beforehand in informal consultations. This article tests two sets of hypotheses about the decision to escalate GATT cases, one concerning the significance of the right to a panel, the other concerning the effects of political regime type. Results show that the right to a panel did not inspire more early settlement, more escalation, or more resolution through concessions at the panel stage; however, highly democratic dyads are more likely to achieve concession, but only at the consultation stage. This suggests that a strategy of tying hands, rather than adherence to legal (and other) norms of conflict resolution, is likely to shed light on the way democracies use formal third-party adjudication at GATT.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Model of Efficient DiscoveryGames and Economic Behavior, 1998
- The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950-1985International Studies Quarterly, 1997
- Signaling Foreign Policy InterestsJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1997
- Third-party techniques for preventing conflict escalation and promoting peaceful settlementInternational Organization, 1996
- Democracy and the Peaceful Settlement of International ConflictAmerican Political Science Review, 1994
- Democracies, Disputes, and Third-Party IntermediariesJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1994
- How Liberalism Produces Democratic PeaceInternational Security, 1994
- Democracy and the Management of International ConflictJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1993
- Why are some international agreements informal?International Organization, 1991
- The Uruguay Round and the Improvements to the Gatt Dispute Settlement Rules and ProceduresInternational & Comparative Law Quarterly, 1989