ON TESTING EQUIVALENCE OF THREE POPULATIONS
- 8 November 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
- Vol. 9 (3) , 465-483
- https://doi.org/10.1081/bip-100101188
Abstract
We consider analysis of clinical trials in which the objective is to show that three populations are equivalent. Equivalence is defined in terms of delta, the maximum difference in population means; a one-sided hypothesis test of delta is considered. We provide the distribution of the maximum pairwise difference in sample means, and we use this distribution to find critical values for tests of size 0.100, 0.050, 0.025, and 0.010. When standard errors are not equal among the three treatments, a simple adjustment is proposed to control the type I error rate. These tests are applied to studying the equivalence of three binomial proportions. Test-based confidence intervals are discussed. Two examples illustrate the proposed methods.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Testing the hypothesis of a nonrmal mean lying outside a convex coneCommunications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 1998
- Safety and immunogenicity of a bivalent Haemophilus influenzae type b/hepatitis B vaccine in healthy infantsThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 1997
- Testing and Selecting for Equivalence with Respect to a ControlJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1994
- Multiple Comparison Procedures for Pooling Batches in Stability StudiesTechnometrics, 1992
- Clinical assessment of the safety and efficacy of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine: rationale and summary of findingsVaccine, 1992
- Some general results on least favorable parameter configurations with special reference to equivalence testing and the range statisticJournal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 1991
- Test statistics and sample size formulae for comparative binomial trials with null hypothesis of non‐zero risk difference or non‐unity relative riskStatistics in Medicine, 1990
- A Comparison of Large-Sample Confidence Interval Methods for the Difference of Two Binomial ProbabilitiesThe American Statistician, 1986
- “Proving the null hypothesis” in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1982
- A test of a multivariate normal mean with composite hypotheses determined by linear inequalitiesBiometrika, 1980