Duration of treatment with vitamin K antagonists in symptomatic venous thromboembolism
- 24 April 2000
- reference entry
- Published by Wiley
- No. 3,p. CD001367
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001367
Abstract
Currently the most frequently used secondary treatment for patients with venous thromboembolism are vitamin K antagonists targeted at an INR of 2.5 (range 2.0 - 3.0). However, based on the continuing risk of bleeding and uncertainty regarding the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism, there is discussion on the proper duration of treatment with vitamin K antagonists for these patients. Recently, several studies were published in which the risk and benefits of different durations of oral anticoagulants were compared in patients with venous thromboembolism. The objective of this review was to evaluate efficacy and safety of different durations of treatment with vitamin K antagonists in patients with symptomatic venous thromboembolism. The reviewers sought publications through computerized searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE, and by hand-searching relevant journals, using the search strategy described by the Cochrane Review Group on Peripheral Vascular Diseases. They also contacted colleagues. Randomized controlled clinical trials comparing different durations of treatment with vitamin K antagonists in patients with symptomatic venous thromboembolism. Two reviewers extracted the data and assessed the quality of the trials independently. Four studies with a total of exactly 1500 patients were included. A consistent reduction for the risk of recurrent events was observed during prolonged treatment with vitamin K antagonists (OR 0.15; 95% CI [0.10 - 0.23]) independent of the period elapsed since the index thrombotic event. A 'rebound' phenomenon, i.e. an excess of recurrences shortly after cessation of the prolonged treatment was not observed (OR 1.11; 95% CI [0.71 - 1.75]). In addition, a substantial increase in bleeding complications was found during the entire period after randomization (OR 7.75; 95% CI [1.08 - 55.57]). In conclusion this meta-analysis shows that treatment with vitamin K antagonists reduces the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism as long as it is used. However, the absolute risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism declines over time, while the risk for major bleeding remains. Thus, the efficiency of vitamin K antagonist administration decreases over time since the index event.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Three Months of Anticoagulation with Extended Anticoagulation for a First Episode of Idiopathic Venous ThromboembolismNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- The Duration of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy after a Second Episode of Venous ThromboembolismNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Treatment of Venous Thrombosis with Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin Administered in the Hospital as Compared with Subcutaneous Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Administered at HomeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Optimum duration of anticoagulation for deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolismThe Lancet, 1992
- Avoidance of large biases and large random errors in the assessment of moderate treatment effects: The need for systematic overviewsStatistics in Medicine, 1987
- NEED FOR LONG-TERM ANTICOAGULANT TREATMENT IN SYMPTOMATIC CALF-VEIN THROMBOSISThe Lancet, 1985
- Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trialsProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1985
- One‐Month versus Six‐Month Therapy with Oral Anticoagulants after Symptomatic Deep Vein ThrombosisActa Medica Scandinavica, 1985
- The Duration of Oral Anticoagulation after Deep Vein ThrombosisActa Medica Scandinavica, 1985
- Warfarin Sodium versus Low-Dose Heparin in the Long-Term Treatment of Venous ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979