The timing and spatiotemporal patterning of Neanderthal disappearance
Top Cited Papers
- 20 August 2014
- journal article
- letter
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature
- Vol. 512 (7514) , 306-309
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13621
Abstract
The timing of Neanderthal disappearance and the extent to which they overlapped with the earliest incoming anatomically modern humans (AMHs) in Eurasia are key questions in palaeoanthropology1,2. Determining the spatiotemporal relationship between the two populations is crucial if we are to understand the processes, timing and reasons leading to the disappearance of Neanderthals and the likelihood of cultural and genetic exchange. Serious technical challenges, however, have hindered reliable dating of the period, as the radiocarbon method reaches its limit at ∼ 50,000 years ago3. Here we apply improved accelerator mass spectrometry 14C techniques to construct robust chronologies from 40 key Mousterian and Neanderthal archaeological sites, ranging from Russia to Spain. Bayesian age modelling was used to generate probability distribution functions to determine the latest appearance date. We show that the Mousterian ended by 41,030–39,260 calibrated years bp (at 95.4% probability) across Europe. We also demonstrate that succeeding ‘transitional’ archaeological industries, one of which has been linked with Neanderthals (Châtelperronian)4, end at a similar time. Our data indicate that the disappearance of Neanderthals occurred at different times in different regions. Comparing the data with results obtained from the earliest dated AMH sites in Europe, associated with the Uluzzian technocomplex5, allows us to quantify the temporal overlap between the two human groups. The results reveal a significant overlap of 2,600–5,400 years (at 95.4% probability). This has important implications for models seeking to explain the cultural, technological and biological elements involved in the replacement of Neanderthals by AMHs. A mosaic of populations in Europe during the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition suggests that there was ample time for the transmission of cultural and symbolic behaviours, as well as possible genetic exchanges, between the two groups.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Neandertal Demise: An Archaeological Analysis of the Modern Human Superiority ComplexPLOS ONE, 2014
- Neandertal Admixture in Eurasia Confirmed by Maximum-Likelihood Analysis of Three GenomesGenetics, 2014
- Higher Levels of Neanderthal Ancestry in East Asians than in EuropeansGenetics, 2013
- Early dispersal of modern humans in Europe and implications for Neanderthal behaviourNature, 2011
- European Middle and Upper Palaeolithic radiocarbon dates are often older than they look: problems with previous dates and some remediesPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2011
- A Draft Sequence of the Neandertal GenomeScience, 2010
- AMS Radiocarbon Dating of Ancient Bone Using UltrafiltrationRadiocarbon, 2006
- Neanderthals and the modern human colonization of EuropeNature, 2004
- Improvements to the Pretreatment of Bone at OxfordRadiocarbon, 2004
- Neanderthal Acculturation in Western Europe? A Critical Review of the Evidence and Its InterpretationCurrent Anthropology, 1998