How effective are rapid access chest pain clinics? Prognosis of incident angina and non-cardiac chest pain in 8762 consecutive patients
- 1 April 2007
- Vol. 93 (4) , 458-463
- https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2006.090894
Abstract
To determine whether rapid access chest pain clinics are clinically effective by comparison of coronary event rates in patients diagnosed with angina with rates in patients diagnosed with non-cardiac chest pain and the general population. Multicentre cohort study of consecutive patients with chest pain attending the rapid access chest pain clinics (RACPCs) of six hospitals in England. 8762 patients diagnosed with either non-cardiac chest pain (n = 6396) or incident angina without prior myocardial infarction (n = 2366) at first cardiological assessment, followed up for a median of 2.57 (interquartile range 1.96-4.15) years. Primary end point--death due to coronary heart disease (International Classification of Diseases (ICD)10 I20-I25) or acute coronary syndrome (non-fatal myocardial infarction (ICD10 I21-I23), hospital admission with unstable angina (I24.0, I24.8, I24.9)). Secondary end points--all-cause mortality (ICD I20), cardiovascular death (ICD10 I00-I99), or non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke (I60-I69). The cumulative probability of the primary end point in patients diagnosed with angina was 16.52% (95% confidence interval (CI) 14.88% to 18.32%) after 3 years compared with 2.73% (95% CI 2.29% to 3.25%) in patients with non-cardiac chest pain. Coronary standardised mortality ratios for men and women with angina aged <65 years were 3.52 (95% CI 1.98 to 5.07) and 4.39 (95% CI 1.14 to 7.64). Of the 599 patients who had the primary end point, 194 (32.4%) had been diagnosed with non-cardiac chest pain. These patients were younger, less likely to have typical symptoms, more likely to be south Asian and more likely to have a normal resting electrocardiogram than patients with angina who had the primary end point. RACPCs are successful in identifying patients with incident angina who are at high coronary risk, but there is a need to reduce misdiagnosis and improve outcomes in patients diagnosed with non-cardiac chest pain who accounted for nearly one third of cardiac events during follow-up.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- N-Terminal Pro–B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and Long-Term Mortality in Stable Coronary Heart DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Angiotensin-Converting–Enzyme Inhibition in Stable Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- ACE Inhibitors for Patients with Vascular Disease without Left Ventricular Dysfunction — May They Rest in PEACE?New England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Effect of long-acting nifedipine on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in patients with stable angina requiring treatment (ACTION trial): randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2004
- Independent and incremental value of coronary artery calcium for predicting the extent of angiographic coronary artery diseaseJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1999
- Joint British recommendations on prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. British Cardiac Society, British Hyperlipidaemia Association, British Hypertension Society, endorsed by the British Diabetic Association.1998
- Computer-generated Correspondence for Patients Attending an Open-access Chest Pain Clinic1998
- Outcome from a rapid-assessment chest pain clinic.QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Incidence, clinical characteristics, and short-term prognosis of angina pectoris.Heart, 1995
- Natural history of angina pectoris in the Framingham study: Prognosis and survivalThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1972