Are Busy Boards Effective Monitors?
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 9 March 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 61 (2) , 689-724
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00852.x
Abstract
Firms with busy boards, those in which a majority of outside directors hold three or more directorships, are associated with weak corporate governance. These firms exhibit lower market‐to‐book ratios, weaker profitability, and lower sensitivity of CEO turnover to firm performance. Independent but busy boards display CEO turnover‐performance sensitivities indistinguishable from those of inside‐dominated boards. Departures of busy outside directors generate positive abnormal returns (ARs). When directors become busy as a result of acquiring an additional directorship, other companies in which they hold board seats experience negative ARs. Busy outside directors are more likely to depart boards following poor performance.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Impact of Stock‐Option Compensation for Outside Directors on Firm Value*The Journal of Business, 2005
- Remuneration, Retention, and Reputation Incentives for Outside DirectorsThe Journal of Finance, 2004
- New Evidence on the Market for Directors: Board Membership and Pennsylvania Senate Bill 1310The Journal of Finance, 2003
- Corporate Governance and Equity PricesThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2003
- Outside directors and CEO turnoverPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Internal Monitoring Mechanisms and CEO Turnover: A Long‐Term PerspectiveThe Journal of Finance, 2001
- Board meeting frequency and firm performancePublished by Elsevier ,1999
- The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1992
- Separation of Ownership and ControlThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1983
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980