A COMPARISON OF SEVERAL METHODS OF ASSESSING PARTIAL KNOWLEDGE IN MULTIPLE‐CHOICE TESTS: I. SCORING PROCEDURES*
- 1 December 1975
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Educational Measurement
- Vol. 12 (4) , 219-230
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1975.tb01023.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- A COMPARISON OF SEVERAL METHODS OF ASSESSING PARTIAL KNOWLEDGE IN MULTIPLE‐CHOICE TESTS: II. TESTING PROCEDURES*Journal of Educational Measurement, 1975
- DIFFERENTIAL WEIGHTING BY JUDGED DEGREE1OF CORRECTNESSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1973
- Validity and Reliability Consequences of Confidence WeightingEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1973
- A COMPARISON OF THE VALIDITIES OF CONVENTIONAL CHOICE TESTING AND VARIOUS CONFIDENCE MARKING PROCEDURESJournal of Educational Measurement, 1971
- THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENTIAL OPTION WEIGHTING ON MULTIPLE‐CHOICE OBJECTIVE TESTS1Journal of Educational Measurement, 1971
- A COMPARISON OF FIVE DIFFERENT SCORING FUNCTIONS FOR CONFIDENCE TESTS1Journal of Educational Measurement, 1970
- A COMPARISON OF THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF TWO METHODS FOR ASSESSING PARTIAL KNOWLEDGE ON A MULTIPLE‐CHOICE TESTJournal of Educational Measurement, 1970
- THE RELIABILITY OF A MULTIPLE‐CHOICE EXAMINATION UNDER VARIOUS TEST‐TAKING INSTRUCTIONS1Journal of Educational Measurement, 1968
- PROBABILISTIC TESTINGJournal of Educational Measurement, 1968
- The Effect on Test Reliability and Validity of Scoring Aptitude and Achievement Tests With Weights for Every ChoiceEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1959