Participants Don’t Need Theories
- 1 October 2004
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Theory & Psychology
- Vol. 14 (5) , 647-665
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354304046177
Abstract
The theory-theory is not supported by evidence in the everyday actions of infants and toddlers whose lives a Theory of Mind is meant radically to transform. This paper reviews some of these challenges to the theory-theory, particularly from communication and deception. We argue that the theory’s disconnection from action is both inevitable and paradoxical. The mind–behaviour dualism upon which it is premised requires a conceptual route to knowing minds and disallows a real test of the theory through the study of action. Taking engagement seriously avoids these problems and requires that both lay people and psychologists be participants rather than observers in order to know, and indeed to create, minds.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Children’s development of a theory of mindEuropean Journal of Psychology of Education, 2000
- The origins of joint visual attention in infants.Developmental Psychology, 1998
- Intentional relations and social understandingBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1996
- Implicit understanding of beliefCognitive Development, 1994
- When is communication a ‘meeting of minds’?Journal of Child Language, 1993
- Attending to behaviour versus attending to knowledge: examining monkeys' attribution of mental statesAnimal Behaviour, 1990
- Small-Scale Deceit: Deception as a Marker of Two-, Three-, and Four-Year-Olds' Early Theories of MindChild Development, 1989
- The Beginnings of Social UnderstandingPublished by Harvard University Press ,1988
- ‘I beg your pardon?’: the preverbal negotiation of failed messagesJournal of Child Language, 1986
- Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ?Cognition, 1985