On the Seizing and Freezing of Negotiator Inferences: Need for Cognitive Closure Moderates the Use of Heuristics in Negotiation
- 1 March 1999
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by SAGE Publications in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Vol. 25 (3) , 348-362
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025003007
Abstract
The relationship between dispositional need for cognitive closure (NFC) and the use of heuristics in negotiation was investigated. In Study 1 (N = 147), negotiators with high NFC were more influenced by focal points when setting limits and making concessions than were negotiators with low NFC. In Study 2 (N = 74), negotiators with high NFC were more influenced by stereotypic information when making concessions than were negotiators with low NFC. Study 3 examined whether results could be attributed to a correlation between NFC and social value orientation—the dispositional tendency to approach the negotation in a prosocial or more selfish way. In three different samples, no such relationship was found. The use of heuristics in negotiation is moderated by need for cognitive closure, and this effect is most likely due to the fact that negotiators with low need for closure are less likely to seize and freeze on information.This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisionsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- On the logic and purpose of significance testing.Psychological Methods, 1997
- Significance Testing in Psychological Research: Some Persisting IssuesPsychological Science, 1997
- On the Surprising Longevity of Flogged Horses: Why There Is a Case for the Significance TestPsychological Science, 1997
- Black-Hat/White-Hat Strategy in Bilateral NegotiationOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1993
- What makes you so sure? Effects of epistemic motivations on judgmental confidenceOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1987
- Bias and error in human judgmentEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 1983
- Effects of situational variables and opponent concessions on a bargainer's perception, aspirations, and concessions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974
- The Resolution of ConflictAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 1973
- A Theory of Social Comparison ProcessesHuman Relations, 1954