The criminalisation of HIV transmission
Open Access
- 1 June 2002
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 28 (3) , 160-163
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.28.3.160
Abstract
Since Bennett, Draper, and Frith published a paper in this journal in 2000 considering the possible criminalisation of HIV transmission, an important legal development has taken place. February 2001 saw the first successful United Kingdom prosecution for the sexual transmission of disease for over a century, when Stephen Kelly was convicted in Glasgow of recklessly injuring his former girlfriend by infecting her with HIV. Whether English criminal law (as opposed to Scots law) can apply criminal penalties in such a case, however, still remains uncertain. This paper, in addition to providing some background to the Kelly case, briefly explores the current possibilities for prosecution under English law. It then proceeds to outline and comment on the issues relevant to criminalisation, responding in part to points made by Bennett, Draper, and Frith and also by Bird and Leigh Brown in a recent article in the British Medical Journal.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Criminalisation of HIV transmission: implications for public health in ScotlandBMJ, 2001
- Ignorance is bliss? HIV and moral duties and legal duties to forewarnJournal of Medical Ethics, 2000
- Sexual EthicsArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1998
- A meta-analysis of condom effectiveness in reducing sexually transmitted HIVSocial Science & Medicine, 1993
- Self-disclosure of HIV infection to sexual partners.American Journal of Public Health, 1991