Evaluation of different methods of bladder drainage used in the early care of spinal cord injury patients
- 1 February 1985
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Spinal Cord
- Vol. 23 (1) , 18-26
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1985.4
Abstract
In a series of 115 spinal cord injury patients four different methods of bladder drainage were used mainly during spinal shock. That is a) suprapubic fine bore cystostomy, b), indwelling Foley catheter, c) intermittent catheterisation; and d) both last methods consecutively. The methods of bladder drainage used did not influence the number of patients becoming catheterfree but determined significantly the length of period before patients became catheterfree. Patients on intermittent catheterisation had the shortest time from injury to established micturition. Patients on intermittent catheterisation and on cystostomy had few complications but in those patients treated with an indwelling Foley catheter the complication rate was high.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Urologic Care of the Spinal Cord Injury PatientJournal of Urology, 1983
- Experience in the Urologic Management of 120 Early Spinal Cord Injury PatientsJournal of Urology, 1978
- Intermittent Catheterization: The Urologist’s Point of ViewJournal of Urology, 1974
- Intermittent Catheterization in Paraplegic PatientsUrologia Internationalis, 1967
- Vesico-ureteric reflux in paraplegiaBritish Journal of Surgery, 1965
- Tidal Drainage of the Urinary BladderNew England Journal of Medicine, 1935
- SPINAL INJURY WITH RETENTION OF URINE;The Lancet, 1919
- A PLEA FOR THE NONCATHETERIZATION OF THE URINARY BLADDERJAMA, 1917