The influence of direct supervision of resistance training on strength performance
- 1 June 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Vol. 32 (6) , 1175-1184
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200006000-00023
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare changes in maximal strength, power, and muscular endurance after 12 wk of periodized heavy-resistance training directly supervised by a personal trainer (SUP) versus unsupervised training (UNSUP). Twenty moderately trained men aged 24.6 +/- 1.0 yr (mean +/- SE) were randomly assigned to either the SUP group (N = 10) or the UNSUP group (N = 8). Both groups performed identical linear periodized resistance training programs consisting of preparatory (10-12 repetitions maximum (RM)), hypertrophy (8 to 10-RM), strength (5 to 8-RM), and peaking phases (3 to 6-RM) using free-weight and variable-resistance machine exercises. Subjects were tested for maximal squat and bench press strength (1-RM), squat jump power output, bench press muscular endurance, and body composition at week 0 and after 12 wk of training. Mean training loads (kg per set) per week were significantly (P < 0.05) greater in the SUP group than the UNSUP group at weeks 7 through 11 for the squat, and weeks 3 and 7 through 12 for the bench press exercises. The rates of increase (slope) of squat and bench press kg per set were significantly greater in the SUP group. Maximal squat and bench press strength were significantly greater at week 12 in the SUP group. Squat and bench press 1-RM, and mean and peak power output increased significantly after training in both groups. Relative local muscular endurance (80% of 1-RM) was not compromised in either group despite significantly greater loads utilized in bench press muscular endurance testing after training. Body mass, fat mass, and fat-free mass increased significantly after training in the SUP group. Directly supervised, heavy-resistance training in moderately trained men resulted in a greater rate of training load increase and magnitude which resulted in greater maximal strength gains compared with unsupervised training.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Strength and Power TrainingExercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 1996
- Compatibility of high-intensity strength and endurance training on hormonal and skeletal muscle adaptationsJournal of Applied Physiology, 1995
- Effect of resistance training on muscle use during exerciseJournal of Applied Physiology, 1994
- Skeletal muscle adaptations during early phase of heavy-resistance training in men and womenJournal of Applied Physiology, 1994
- Endogenous Anabolic Hormonal and Growth Factor Responses to Heavy Resistance Exercise in Males and FemalesInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 1991
- Physiological Adaptations to Resistance ExerciseSports Medicine, 1988
- Physiologic Responses to Heavy-Resistance Exercise with Very Short Rest Periods*International Journal of Sports Medicine, 1987
- Training of Muscle Strength and Power: Interaction of Neuromotoric, Hypertrophic, and Mechanical FactorsInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 1986
- Effects of Three Resistance Training Programs on Muscular Strength And Absolute and Relative EnduranceResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1982
- Generalized equations for predicting body density of menBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1978