Relation between upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation threshold in humans.
- 1 July 1993
- journal article
- abstracts
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 88 (1) , 186-192
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.88.1.186
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the canine model, an upper limit of shock strength exists that can induce ventricular fibrillation during the vulnerable period of the cardiac cycle. This shock strength (the upper limit of vulnerability) closely correlates with the defibrillation threshold and supports the "upper limit of vulnerability" hypothesis of defibrillation. It is not known whether an upper limit of vulnerability exists in humans or whether this limit correlates with the defibrillation threshold. METHODS AND RESULTS In 13 patients undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, the shock strengths associated with a 50% probability of reaching the upper limit of vulnerability (ULV50) and a 50% probability of reaching the defibrillation threshold (DFT50) were determined by the up-down algorithm. The ULV50 was determined only for the mid-upslope of the positive T waves and for the mid-downslope of the negative T waves. No major complications occurred during surgery. An upper limit of vulnerability was demonstrated in each patient. The ULV50 was 300 +/- 138 V or 6.8 +/- 5.8 J, which was significantly lower than the DFT50 of 347 +/- 167 V (p = 0.038) or 9.1 +/- 7.3 J (p = 0.013). The correlation between the ULV50 and the DFT50 was significant (r = 0.90, p < 0.001 for voltage; r = 0.93, p < 0.001 for energy). CONCLUSIONS An upper limit of vulnerability is present in humans. There is a significant correlation between the ULV50 and the DFT50, and the ULV50 is significantly lower than the DFT50.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is Defibrillation Testing Safe?Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1991
- Effects of pacing rate and timing of defibrillation shock on the relation between the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of vulnerability in open chest dogsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991
- Defibrillation Threshold Testing and Other Practices Related to AICD Implantation: Do All Roads Lead to Rome?Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1989
- The relationship between successful defibrillation and delivered energy in open-chest dogs: Reappraisal of the “defibrillation threshold” conceptAmerican Heart Journal, 1987
- Activation during ventricular defibrillation in open-chest dogs. Evidence of complete cessation and regeneration of ventricular fibrillation after unsuccessful shocks.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1986
- Termination of Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmias with an Implanted Automatic Defibrillator in Human BeingsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- An energy-time analysis of ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation thresholds with internal electrodesMedical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 1976