The size of the renal pelvis on ultrasonography in children
- 1 November 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Clinical Ultrasound
- Vol. 17 (9) , 647-651
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.1870170906
Abstract
Eighty-seven patients and 60 normal children were studied to determine the upper limit of the renal pelvic size in children and its relation to disease and age. The renal pelves were all measured by ultrasonography. Further radiologic examinations were performed on the disease group to confirm the final diagnosis. We found that a 10 mm diameter was the upper limit of the normal renal pelvis. Second, measuring the renal pelvic size on an ultrasonogram was highly reliable in diagnosing obstructive uropathy (100% sensitivity, 90.3% specificity). However, when the ultrasonogram with the 10 mm criterion was the sole diagnostic measure, many nonobstructive hydronephroses cases (26/37) were misdiagnosed. Therefore, other diagnostic tools should be employed. Third, the size of the renal pelvis was not influenced by age in children.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Neonatal hydronephrosis in the era of sonographyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1987
- HydronephrosisPublished by Springer Nature ,1987
- Nondilated obstructive acute renal failure: diagnostic procedures and therapeutic management.Radiology, 1986
- Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of hydronephrosis in patients with normal renal functionUrologic Radiology, 1983
- Minimal-dilatation obstructive nephropathy.Radiology, 1982
- Ultrasonic inaccuracies in diagnosing renal obstructionUrology, 1982
- Can real-time ultrasonography replace static B-scanning in the diagnosis of renal obstruction?Radiology, 1981
- Diagnosis of hydronephrosis: comparison of radionuclide scanning and sonographyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1980
- Ultrasound scanning for monitoring childhood hydronephrosisJournal of Clinical Ultrasound, 1978
- Sensitivity of gray scale ultrasound in detecting urinary tract obstructionAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1978