The Dynamics of Campaign Fundraising in House Elections
- 1 May 1994
- journal article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in The Journal of Politics
- Vol. 56 (2) , 459-474
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2132148
Abstract
Examination of disaggregated Federal Election Commission fundraising data for 1985-1986 House candidates illustrates the tremendous financial advantage incumbents enjoy over challengers. Incumbents raise more money than challengers in every single period of the election cycle, particularly in the decisive time just before the election. Incumbents are also able to react quickly to well-financed opposition. Challengers, on the other hand, must raise money early to experience fundraising success later on, and they are unable to respond to incumbent fundraising by raising more money themselves. Our intraelection analysis, in sum, confirms many of the inferences other researchers have drawn from cross-sectional data.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rebuttal to Jacobson's "New Evidence for Old Arguments"American Journal of Political Science, 1990
- Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1988
- Preempting Quality Challengers in House ElectionsThe Journal of Politics, 1988
- Preemptive and reactive spending in U.S. House racesPolitical Behavior, 1986
- Explaining Challenger Quality in Congressional ElectionsThe Journal of Politics, 1985
- Money and votes: A simultaneous equation modelPublic Choice, 1981
- Social Classes in Agrarian Societies. By Rodolfo Stavenhagen. (Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor, Doubleday, 1975. Pp. xiv + 266. $3.50.)American Political Science Review, 1978