Selection and the Extent of Explanatory Unification
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Philosophy of Science
- Vol. 66 (S3) , S196-S209
- https://doi.org/10.1086/392725
Abstract
According to Philip Kitcher, scientific unification is achieved via the derivation of numerous scientific statements from economies of argument schemata. I demonstrate that the unification of selection phenomena across domains in which it is claimed to occur—evolutionary biology, immunology and, speculatively, neurobiology—is unattainable on Kitcher's view. I then introduce an alternative method for rendering the desired unification based on the concept of a mechanism schema. I conclude that the gain in unification provided by the alternative account suggests that Kitcher's view is defective.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- How the unification theory of explanation escapes asymmetry problemsErkenntnis, 1995
- Reductionism and the Unification Theory of ExplanationPhilosophy of Science, 1995
- Causality Without CounterfactualsPhilosophy of Science, 1994
- Greater Unification equals Greater Understanding?Analysis, 1993
- Explanatory Unification and the Problem of AsymmetryPhilosophy of Science, 1992
- A study in theory unification: The case of Maxwell's electromagnetic theoryStudies in History and Philosophy of Science, 1992
- Selection Type TheoriesPhilosophy of Science, 1989
- Explanatory UnificationPhilosophy of Science, 1981
- Explanation, Conjunction, and UnificationThe Journal of Philosophy, 1976
- Explanation and Scientific UnderstandingThe Journal of Philosophy, 1974