Variance identification and efficiency analysis in randomized experiments under the matched‐pair design
- 10 July 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 27 (24) , 4857-4873
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3337
Abstract
In his 1923 landmark article, Neyman introduced randomization-based inference to estimate average treatment effects from experiments under the completely randomized design. Under this framework, Neyman considered the statistical estimation of the sample average treatment effect and derived the variance of the standard estimator using the treatment assignment mechanism as the sole basis of inference. In this paper, I extend Neyman's analysis to randomized experiments under the matched-pair design where experimental units are paired based on their pre-treatment characteristics and the randomization of treatment is subsequently conducted within each matched pair. I study the variance identification for the standard estimator of average treatment effects and analyze the relative efficiency of the matched-pair design over the completely randomized design. I also show how to empirically evaluate the relative efficiency of the two designs using experimental data obtained under the matched-pair design. My randomization-based analysis differs from previous studies in that it avoids modeling and other assumptions as much as possible. Finally, the analytical results are illustrated with numerical and empirical examples. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Misunderstandings Between Experimentalists and Observationalists about Causal InferenceJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 2008
- A “politically robust” experimental design for public policy evaluation, with application to the Mexican Universal Health Insurance programJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2007
- Optimal multivariate matching before randomizationBiostatistics, 2004
- Breaking the matches in a paired t‐test for community interventions when the number of pairs is smallStatistics in Medicine, 1995
- Statistics and Causal InferenceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1986
- On the efficiency of matched pairs in Bernoulli trialsBiometrika, 1968
- 184 Note: Loss of Power through Ineffective Pairing of Observations in Small Two-Treatment All-or-None ExperimentsBiometrics, 1963
- The Randomization Theory of Experimental InferenceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1955
- The Randomization Analysis of a Generalized Randomized Block DesignBiometrika, 1955
- Statistical Problems in Agricultural ExperimentationJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1935