Misunderstandings Between Experimentalists and Observationalists about Causal Inference
Top Cited Papers
- 10 March 2008
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society
- Vol. 171 (2) , 481-502
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985x.2007.00527.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- National Institutes of Aging (P01 AG17625-01)
- National Institute of Mental Health
- National Institute of Drug Abuse (MH066247)
- National Science Foundation (SES-0318275, IIS-9874747, SES-0550873)
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Affinely invariant matching methods with discriminant mixtures of proportional ellipsoidally symmetric distributionsThe Annals of Statistics, 2006
- The Dangers of Extreme CounterfactualsPolitical Analysis, 2006
- Do Get-Out-the-Vote Calls Reduce Turnout? The Importance of Statistical Methods for Field ExperimentsAmerican Political Science Review, 2005
- Family formation among women in the U.S. military: Evidence from the nLSYJournal of Marriage and Family, 2005
- Double Disadvantage or Signs of Resilience? The Elementary School Contexts of Children From Mexican Immigrant FamiliesAmerican Educational Research Journal, 2005
- Optimal multivariate matching before randomizationBiostatistics, 2004
- Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practiceand problemsStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field ExperimentAmerican Political Science Review, 2000
- Matching to Remove Bias in Observational StudiesPublished by JSTOR ,1973
- The Planning of Observational Studies of Human PopulationsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1965