Affinely invariant matching methods with discriminant mixtures of proportional ellipsoidally symmetric distributions
Open Access
- 1 August 2006
- journal article
- Published by Institute of Mathematical Statistics in The Annals of Statistics
- Vol. 34 (4) , 1814-1826
- https://doi.org/10.1214/009053606000000407
Abstract
In observational studies designed to estimate the effects of interventions or exposures, such as cigarette smoking, it is desirable to try to control background differences between the treated group (e.g., current smokers) and the control group (e.g., never smokers) on covariates $X$ (e.g., age, education). Matched sampling attempts to effect this control by selecting subsets of the treated and control groups with similar distributions of such covariates. This paper examines the consequences of matching using affinely invariant methods when the covariate distributions are ``discriminant mixtures of proportional ellipsoidally symmetric'' (DMPES) distributions, a class herein defined, which generalizes the ellipsoidal symmetry class of Rubin and Thomas [Ann. Statist. 20 (1992) 1079--1093]. The resulting generalized results help indicate why earlier results hold quite well even when the simple assumption of ellipsoidal symmetry is not met [e.g., Biometrics 52 (1996) 249--264]. Extensions to conditionally affinely invariant matching with conditionally DMPES distributions are also discussed.
Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do Get-Out-the-Vote Calls Reduce Turnout? The Importance of Statistical Methods for Field ExperimentsAmerican Political Science Review, 2005
- Nonparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Under Exogeneity: A ReviewThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 2004
- Combining Propensity Score Matching with Additional Adjustments for Prognostic CovariatesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2000
- Causal Effects in Nonexperimental Studies: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Training ProgramsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1999
- 6. Matching with Multiple Controls to Estimate Treatment Effects in Observational StudiesSociological Methodology, 1997
- Characterizing the effect of matching using linear propensity score methods with normal distributionsBiometrika, 1992
- Affinely Invariant Matching Methods with Ellipsoidal DistributionsThe Annals of Statistics, 1992
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983
- Multivariate Matching Methods That are Equal Percent Bias Reducing, I: Some ExamplesBiometrics, 1976
- The Efficiency of Logistic Regression Compared to Normal Discriminant AnalysisJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1975