Tachycardia, contractility and volume loading alter conventional indexes of coronary flow reserve, but not the instantaneous hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index
- 1 November 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 20 (5) , 1261-1269
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(92)90386-2
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Instantaneous hyperemic flow-versus-pressure slope index. Microsphere validation of an alternative to measures of coronary reserve.Circulation, 1991
- The diastolic hyperemic flow versus pressure relation. A new index of coronary stenosis severity and flow reserve.Circulation, 1989
- Measurements of coronary flow reserve: defining pathophysiology versus making decisions about patient care.Circulation, 1987
- Relation between graded, subcritical impairments of coronary flow reserve and regional myocardial dysfunction induced by isoproterenol infusion in dogsAmerican Heart Journal, 1987
- Relation of coronary blood flow and reactive hyperemia to regional dysfunction induced by dopamine infusion in dogs: Limitations in detecting subcritical coronary stenosesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1985
- Maximal coronary flow and the concept of coronary vascular reserve.Circulation, 1984
- Measurements of coronary velocity and reactive hyperemia in the coronary circulation of humans.Circulation Research, 1981
- Pressure-flow characteristics of coronary stenoses in unsedated dogs at rest and during coronary vasodilation.Circulation Research, 1978
- Pressure drop across artificially induced stenoses in the femoral arteries of dogs.Circulation Research, 1975
- Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosisThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1974